What Does AI-Era Education Look Like? Stanford Students and President Levin's Vision
Stanford University's campus draws exceptional students from around the world to work at the frontiers of scholarship and research. This conversation brings together current student Josh Bak, ASSU (Associated Students of Stanford University) Executive President Ava Brown, and President Jonathan Levin — three people with different vantage points on the same institution, speaking openly about what makes Stanford genuinely distinctive, what it's getting right, and where it's still working through difficult questions.
President Levin engages directly with the day-to-day realities of campus life while simultaneously managing the tensions introduced by federal policy changes, the rapid advance of AI, and the implications of growing the incoming class. The student leaders bring complementary perspectives: Ava on community engagement and institutional advocacy, Josh on the experience of deliberately stepping outside one's comfort zone to discover unexpected learning.
This article examines the leadership and student experience dimensions of this conversation — what's changing at Stanford, what advice experienced students offer incoming ones, and how the institution is thinking about the role of AI in education.
- Student Leaders on the Reality and Challenges of Campus Life
- AI and Education: Stanford's Approach to a Rapidly Shifting Landscape
- Institutional Reform and Student Agency: Practical Advice for Incoming Students
- Summary
Looking to optimize community management?
We have prepared materials on BASE best practices and success stories.
Student Leaders on the Reality and Challenges of Campus Life
Ava Brown's perspective as ASSU Executive President is grounded in direct engagement with both students and administration. Her core argument: the richness of Stanford is inseparable from its community, and getting value from the institution requires active participation rather than passive attendance. "The diversity of new encounters and experiences is what makes Stanford a special place," she says — framing community engagement not as an add-on but as the mechanism through which the academic environment actually delivers its value.
Josh Bak's most memorable example of this principle: as a Computer Science major, he deliberately enrolled in "Introduction to Clowning" — a course entirely outside his technical focus. The choice was uncomfortable. That discomfort was the point. His account of what the experience actually provided — exposure to a completely different kind of intelligence, different performance skills, a different community of people — illustrates the case for curriculum breadth more concretely than abstract arguments about interdisciplinary education.
President Levin characterizes Stanford's distinction as residing not in its reputation but in its ongoing generativity — the constant production of new knowledge and energy across the campus. Every class, research session, sports event, and everyday campus interaction contributes to this. He also addresses directly the real external pressures affecting the institution: federal policy changes, global economic and political dynamics that affect university funding and operations. His response is active rather than passive — internal adjustments, advocacy, and a clear commitment to preserving Stanford's capacity to function as a genuine research university.
Curriculum reform is also in active discussion. The COLLEGE (Civic, Liberal, and Global Education) program — a required first-year curriculum focused on broad intellectual foundations — is under review, with the possibility of expansion to cover more of the undergraduate experience. The question is whether providing a more unified intellectual foundation for all students early in their time at Stanford improves outcomes, and how to balance that against the flexibility students need to pursue their individual paths. President Levin's response is cautious and genuinely open: "We're examining this carefully, not assuming the outcome."
The campus housing system also reflects this moment of institutional self-examination. The previous "Neighborhood System" for student housing has been discontinued, and a new residential structure is being developed. The expansion of incoming class size — which Levin frames as "expanding opportunity by giving more talented students the chance to be educated at Stanford" — means both greater diversity in the incoming population and the practical need to provide quality housing and community infrastructure at larger scale. The two challenges are connected: a larger, more diverse class enriches the community, but requires investment to integrate well.
AI and Education: Stanford's Approach to a Rapidly Shifting Landscape
President Levin describes the influence of AI on education as significant, rapidly evolving, and not yet fully understood — a characterization that distinguishes genuine intellectual honesty from either dismissiveness or hype.
The COLLEGE curriculum review explicitly includes consideration of how AI changes what skills and knowledge matter for undergraduates. This is not primarily a question about whether to teach students to use AI tools — it's a deeper question about what role human judgment, ethical reasoning, civic knowledge, and humanistic understanding play in a world where many technical tasks can be automated. The answer has implications for curriculum design across the entire university, not just introductory requirements.
Ava frames the student government dimension of this challenge around community buy-in — the recognition that institutional changes to curriculum or requirements only succeed when students genuinely understand and value what's being asked of them. ASSU's role in this context is not just advocacy but communication: translating between the administration's perspective on what education should accomplish and students' actual experience of what the curriculum delivers.
Josh's Computer Science background makes him an interesting voice on AI in education specifically. His choice to deliberately step outside CS and into an arts-based course reflects a view that technical expertise alone is insufficient — that the judgment, creativity, and interpersonal competence required to do meaningful work with AI systems can't be built purely through technical training. President Levin has described "reinforcing the culture of inquiry and curiosity, and promoting constructive dialogue" as a central institutional goal, which resonates with Josh's experience of finding unexpected value outside his major.
The specific programs and features that Stanford has developed — active discussion groups, workshops, research projects that bridge theory and practice — create an environment where AI literacy and human capability develop in parallel rather than in competition. The claim is not that AI makes human education less important, but that it changes what aspects of human capability matter most. Stanford's current moment of curriculum review is, in part, an effort to understand that change and respond to it systematically rather than reactively.
Institutional Reform and Student Agency: Practical Advice for Incoming Students
Ava and Josh are direct with incoming students about what actually produces a good Stanford experience: active participation in the community rather than passive consumption of the curriculum.
Ava's framing: commitment to community engagement has to be genuine, not performative. Being genuinely invested in other people, in shared activities and projects, in the institution itself — this is what creates the reciprocal relationships that make the Stanford environment actually valuable. "Putting yourself out there," as she frames it, is not just socially pleasant; it's educationally necessary.
Josh's framing: the comfort zone is the enemy of learning. His "Introduction to Clowning" example isn't offered as a quirky anecdote but as evidence for a structural point: the most valuable learning often comes from encountering domains and people that have nothing obvious to do with your primary focus. This is especially true for students in highly technical fields, where the risk of over-specialization early is real.
The practical advice they offer together:
- Pursue interests and unfamiliar areas actively, not just primary specialization
- Engage with multiple communities on campus, actively learning from others
- Embrace failure and challenge daily — small experiences compound into large growth
The first weeks of any new academic environment are overwhelming: too much information, too many choices, too many new people. Ava and Josh are explicit that the disorientation of that period is not a problem to be solved but an opportunity to be used. Taking on things that feel uncertain — events, clubs, research projects, academic choices — while everything is already new and uncertain is the lowest-cost time to experiment.
President Levin's personal contribution to this section: his memory of specific small moments from his own student years — walking the campus at night, conversations with friends, sensory details of the place itself — as things that shaped who he became. This is a reminder that the educational value of a place is not exhausted by the formal curriculum. The relationships, the physical environment, the community culture, the small and unremarkable daily encounters — these accumulate into something that's difficult to specify but real in its effects on who people become.
Summary
This conversation between Stanford's president and two student leaders reveals an institution genuinely engaged with the questions its moment demands — about AI's role in education, about how to expand opportunity without diluting quality, about what curriculum elements are foundational enough to require of everyone and what should remain flexible.
The practical takeaways for students at any institution:
- Community engagement is not optional — it's the mechanism through which academic environments deliver their value
- Deliberate exposure to unfamiliar domains builds capabilities that specialization alone cannot
- The uncomfortable early period of any new environment is the best time to experiment, because the cost of trying new things is lowest when everything is already uncertain
For institutions and organizations: the questions Stanford is wrestling with — how to integrate AI into human development rather than substituting for it, how to build community in rapidly changing environments, how to balance standardization with individual agency — are not unique to universities. They appear in any organization trying to develop human capability during a period of significant technological change.
Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLr66pV83Dc
Streamline Event Management with AI | TIMEWELL Base
Struggling with large-scale event operations?
TIMEWELL Base is an AI-powered event management platform.
Track Record
- Adventure World: Managed Dream Day with 4,272 participants
- TechGALA 2026: Centrally managed 110 side events
Key Features
| Feature | Result |
|---|---|
| AI page generation | Event page completed in 30 seconds |
| Low-cost payments | 4.8% fee (industry-leading low rate) |
| Community features | 65% continue engaging after events |
Feel free to reach out for a consultation on streamlining your event operations.